Skip to main content
Alvin QuachFull Stack Developer
HomeProjectsExperienceBlog
HomeProjectsExperienceBlog
alvinquach

Full Stack Developer building systems that respect complexity.

Open to opportunities

AQ

Projects

  • All Projects
  • Hoparc Physical Therapy
  • OpportunIQ
  • Hoop Almanac
  • SculptQL

Knowledge

  • Blog
  • Experience
  • Interview Prep

Connect

  • Contact
  • LinkedIn
  • GitHub
  • X

Resources

  • Resume
© 2026All rights reserved.
Back to Blogs
Decision
Depth: ●●○○○

Tina CMS vs Sanity: When to Choose Each

A practical comparison based on building production sites with both headless CMS platforms.

Published July 28, 20251 min readImportance: ★★★★☆
Share:

Tina CMS vs Sanity: When to Choose Each

I've built production sites with both. Here's when I reach for each.

Tina CMS Strengths

1. Visual editing - edit content directly on the page

2. Git-backed - content lives in your repo

3. No query language to learn - uses its own abstraction

4. Great for developers who want simplicity

When building Kevin T Lam's portfolio, I chose Tina because the client needed to edit content visually without learning GROQ. The Git-backed approach also meant simpler deployment.

Sanity Strengths

1. GROQ is incredibly powerful for complex queries

2. Real-time collaboration out of the box

3. Image pipeline with automatic optimization

4. Structured content for maximum flexibility

Decision Framework

Choose Tina when: client needs visual editing, simpler content model, Git-based workflow preferred.

Choose Sanity when: complex content relationships, real-time collaboration needed, advanced querying required.