A practical comparison based on building production sites with both headless CMS platforms.
I've built production sites with both. Here's when I reach for each.
1. Visual editing - edit content directly on the page
2. Git-backed - content lives in your repo
3. No query language to learn - uses its own abstraction
4. Great for developers who want simplicity
When building Kevin T Lam's portfolio, I chose Tina because the client needed to edit content visually without learning GROQ. The Git-backed approach also meant simpler deployment.
1. GROQ is incredibly powerful for complex queries
2. Real-time collaboration out of the box
3. Image pipeline with automatic optimization
4. Structured content for maximum flexibility
Choose Tina when: client needs visual editing, simpler content model, Git-based workflow preferred.
Choose Sanity when: complex content relationships, real-time collaboration needed, advanced querying required.